Celestica (CLS) and NANO DIMENSION/S (NNDM) Critical Survey

Share on StockTwits

Celestica (NYSE: CLS) and NANO DIMENSION/S (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Celestica and NANO DIMENSION/S’s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica $6.11 billion 0.23 $105.00 million $0.72 16.49
NANO DIMENSION/S $860,000.00 44.95 -$18.17 million ($1.61) -1.30

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than NANO DIMENSION/S. NANO DIMENSION/S is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Celestica has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NANO DIMENSION/S has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.


This table compares Celestica and NANO DIMENSION/S’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica 1.57% 7.15% 3.31%
NANO DIMENSION/S -1,277.56% -75.88% -64.87%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Celestica and NANO DIMENSION/S, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica 0 5 3 0 2.38
NANO DIMENSION/S 0 0 2 0 3.00

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of $12.90, suggesting a potential upside of 8.68%. NANO DIMENSION/S has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 233.33%. Given NANO DIMENSION/S’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NANO DIMENSION/S is more favorable than Celestica.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.9% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of NANO DIMENSION/S shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.


Celestica beats NANO DIMENSION/S on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Celestica

Celestica Inc. provides design, manufacturing, hardware platform, and supply chain solutions in Canada and internationally. The company offers a range of services, including design and development, engineering, supply chain management, new product introduction, component sourcing, electronics manufacturing, assembly and test, complex mechanical assembly, systems integration, precision machining, order fulfillment, logistics, and after-market repair and return services. Its products and services are used in various applications, such as servers, networking and telecommunications equipment, storage systems, converged systems, optical equipment, aerospace and defense electronics, healthcare products and applications, semiconductor equipment, and industrial and alternative energy products. The company serves customers in the aerospace and defense, industrial, smart energy, healthcare, semiconductor equipment, consumer, communications, and enterprise end markets. Celestica Inc. was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.


Nano Dimension Ltd., through its subsidiary, Nano Dimension Technologies Ltd., develops three-dimensional (3D) printed circuit board printers. It also develops conductive and dielectric ink. Nano Dimension Ltd. was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in Ness Ziona, Israel.

Receive News & Ratings for Celestica Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Celestica and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Leave a Reply